36 Young Street, Manchester, M3 3FT
DX: 718188 MCH 3
Direct Dial: 0161 832 9082
5 Park Square, Leeds, LS1 2NE
DX: 713113 LEEDS PARK SQ
Direct Dial: 0113 242 1123
Embassy House, 60 Church Street,
Birmingham, B3 2DJ
DX: 13023 BIRMINGHAM
Direct Dial: 0121 200 3570
Clerked by:Harry Young
Martin has regular instructions in most areas including banking, shareholder and partner disputes, business sale warranties, directors’ duties and disqualification, confidential information, passing off, insurance and commercial torts. A significant element of contentious work involves urgent interim relief applications, delivery-up orders, freezing injunctions and search and seizure orders.
Significant reported cases
Fons HF v (1) Pillar Securitisation SARL (2) Bracken Investments Ltd
Acting for Icelandic liquidator in £14m claim for alleged misappropriation of shares in Hamleys toy stores taken as security for debt after the collapse of the Icelandic banks.
Bendalls v Exova
International Court of Arbitration dispute arising from defective testing on an installation at a nuclear facility in the USA.
Harewood International v Unique Forwarding
Dispute between importer and freight forwarder re: products being shipped from China. Issue of unlawful lien being exercised. 10 day High Court trial
Seaga Intl v (1) Apollo VS Ltd (2) Rawding
22 day trial on a claim for an account based on an unravelling of 5 year commercial distribution agreement together with claim against a director on a personal guarantee.
Lucas Fettes v Centric & ors
Mercantile Court trial on breach of fiduciary duty / conspiracy re solicitation of clients to competitor. £800k claim.
Lazo Properties v Finestone Properties
Competing claims to title of valuable development site. The Chief Land Registrar joined the proceedings as intervener on his own initiative because of the importance of the case.
Yong Lian Yinshua Hao Cai Ltd & anr v Print Chem & ors
Large intellectual property case re theft of secret chemical formulations
RCP v Stockport MBC
Representing local authority in large-scale litigation over commercial operation and status of occupation of three prime site car parks
Other reported cases:
James Andrew Robinson v P.E. Jones (Contractors) Ltd.  3 WLR 815 : BLR 206 : 134 Con LR 26 :  1 EGLR 111 : (2011) 27 Const LJ 145 : CILL 2972 :  4 EG 100 (CS) :  QB 44
A seminal, law-textbook Court of Appeal case on crossover liability in contract/tort. Where one party to a contract owed the other a contractual duty of care, there was no automatic assumption of an identical duty of care in tort. Whether or not the doctrine of assumption of responsibility could be applied to building contracts so as to give rise to tortious liability for pure economic loss arising from a latent defect depended on the relationship and dealings between the parties; a contractual clause that expressly excluded tortious liability satisfied the requirement of reasonableness under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
ASE PLC & anor v Kendrick & ors  EWHC 2171 (QB)(Lewis J)
An interim injunction preventing an employee from competing for six months with his former employer, a company in the automotive industry, was granted where that employee had held significant responsibility for nurturing and fostering clients, which was vital information in the industry. An injunction sought by a partnership related to that company to enforce a non-solicitation clause in respect of another employee was refused where it sought to restrict soliciting of the company's clients, whereas the partnership contract was limited to those of the partnership's.
Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd.  EWHC 3062 (QB)
An insurer had not acted unlawfully when making settlement offers directly to claimants in low-value personal injury claims arising from road traffic accidents, notwithstanding conditional fee agreements entered into by the claimants with a firm of solicitors.
Anthony McGill v Sports & Entertainment Media Group & 8 ors  EWHC 3000 (QB) QBD (Merc) (Manchester) (Judge Waksman QC)
Claim brought by a football agent excluded from a transfer at the last minute.
Mark Cooper v Bank of Scotland PLC  EWHC 4645 (Ch)
Relief from sanctions application in a high value banking claim.
Dennis Hobson v Patrick Magee (T/A Team Magee)  EWCA Civ 116 CA (Civ Div) (Longmore LJ, Davis LJ, Sir David Keene)
A judge's overall conclusions, in an action concerning a failed joint venture for the arrangement of boxing matches, were properly open to him on the evidence. In particular, he was entitled to conclude that one of the parties had contracted as a principal.
Tinseltime Ltd v (1) Eryl Roberts (2) M & JT Davies (3) Denbighshire County Council (4) Welsh Assembly  EWHC 1199 (TCC)
An employer was not liable in nuisance or negligence for damage caused to a neighbouring company's machinery by dust resulting from a sub-contractor's cutting of concrete blocks since that activity could not be regarded as exceptionally dangerous whatever precautions were taken.
Keith Harrison v Link Financial Ltd  ECC 26 QBD (Merc) (Judge Chambers QC)
The court cancelled a borrower's debts after it found that the creditors had not only breached the Consumer Credit Act 1974 by not providing him with a copy of the terms and conditions and by giving him too short a deadline under a default notice, but had also harassed him over the debt.
R (on the application of Debt Free Direct Ltd) v Advertising Standards Authority Ltd EWHC 1337 (Admin) QBD (Admin) (Sullivan J)  ACD 82
A without notice injunction granted to prevent publication of an adjudication that a television advertisement was misleading was discharged as it was inappropriate to restrain a public body from publishing its adjudication, and an application for judicial review of the adjudication was refused as there was an alternative effective remedy of internal review.
George Lavelle v Tracy Lavelle & ors  EWCA Civ 223 CA (Civ Div) (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR, May LJ, Jonathan Parker LJ)  2 FCR 418
Trial judge was correct to find that the evidence clearly showed no intention by the respondent to transfer property to the appellants by way of gift.
Barry Martin Parker v Laurence Stephen Snyder & ors  EWCA Civ 488
Where a draft amended statement of case disclosed viable causes of action and was not so lacking in particularity as to be an abuse of process, the Court of Appeal reversed the judge's decision refusing permission to amend and striking out the claim.
He's technically bright, extremely pragmatic and excellent both on paper and in court." "He gets to the point very quickly and doesn't beat about the bush."
Martin is a busy senior junior who has progressed to dealing with substantial pieces of litigation (often appearing alone against Queen's Counsel). Martin has been ranked consistently in the directories as a leading practitioner year on year since 2006. He served on the Attorney General's Panel of Counsel for five years. He carries a broad practice as detailed below. His established background in both commercial litigation and employment law makes him well suited to issues in the sports law field and he is nationally recognised for considerable experience in all aspects of sports law litigation and is ranked in Band 1 for the Regions by Chambers and Partners UK. He also sits as an arbitrator in sports disputes, appointed by Sport Resolutions.
Year of Call: 1999
Areas of expertise
British Association for Sport and the Law
Northern Circuit Commercial Bar Association
Arbitrator for Sport Resolutions and the Football League
Chambers UK 2018:
"He is very calm, good with clients and gets to the nub of cases very quickly." "He is very impressive in court and gives clear, pragmatic advice."
"First class and very commercial." "He made everything digestible, his advocacy was second to none and I think he pitched it perfectly."
Chambers UK 2017:
"He's technically bright, extremely pragmatic and excellent both on paper and in court." "He gets to the point very quickly and doesn't beat about the bush." "Good on his feet and calm under pressure."
"A real star and a sports nut who gets some great results for players."
Chambers UK 2015:
"He's very hard-working and really understands the sports sector."
Chambers UK 2014:
Martin Budworth “is best recognised for his expertise in football and boxing”
Chambers UK 2013:
Martin Budworth "maintains a broad commercial litigation practice, and has carved out a considerable niche in sports disputes. Instructing solicitors speak highly of the commercial approach of this experienced junior, who continues to receive notable instructions in sports cases."
Legal 500 2018:
‘A very bright innovative thinker.’
‘He is very client-friendly.’
Legal 500 2017:
‘A very bright and innovative thinker, who has the ability to be a real street fighter when required.’
‘Pragmatic and great on his feet.'
Legal 500 2015:
"An excellent cross-examiner"
Legal 500 2014:
"Very commercial and client friendly"
Legal 500 2014:
"Presents his case in a very bench-friendly way"