John Hunter recently appeared on behalf of Wyre Borough Council in an appeal against the refusal of outline planning permission for a new 200 dwelling retirement village in Catterall, Lancashire.
The main issues included the need for specialist accommodation for older people, the appropriateness of the site’s location for older persons’ housing, the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, and the impact of the development on the setting of a nearby listed building.
The inspector acknowledged the critical need to provide housing for older people (in line with recent changes to the Government’s Planning Practice Guidance), as well as the fact that large-scale development had been permitted on the other side of the A6 from the appeal site. Nevertheless, she agreed with the Council that the appeal site was not a sustainable location for this form of development due to the presence of the A6 as a significant barrier to movement, the location of bus stops and the unsuitability of proposed walking routes into the village, which was not adequately mitigated by the appellant’s offer of a time-limited minibus service. She also agreed with the Council that little weight could be attached to the claimed benefits of the scheme in terms of providing community facilities in the absence of detailed proposals or a satisfactory mechanism to ensure they would in fact be provided. In addition, she also agreed with the Council that, although in outline, the development was likely to be prominent and at odds with the character and appearance of its immediate surroundings. In conclusion, she dismissed the appeal finding that the adverse impacts of granting permission would clearly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits. The inspector’s decision can be found here.
This is the second time this year that John has appeared in an appeal relating to land in Catterall. Earlier in the year John acted for the appellant against the local planning authority in a successful appeal (and application for costs) against the Council’s refusal to grant planning permission for residential development on a part of the site on the other side of the A6 referred to above which was allocated for employment purposes. The appeal decision can be found here and the costs decision here.
36 Young Street, Manchester, M3 3FT
DX: 718188 MCH 3
Direct Dial: 0161 832 9082
5 Park Square, Leeds, LS1 2NE
DX: 713113 LEEDS PARK SQ
Direct Dial: 0113 242 1123
Embassy House, 60 Church Street,
Birmingham, B3 2DJ
DX: 13023 BIRMINGHAM
Direct Dial: 0121 200 3570
We are pleased to announce our annual Mini-Pupillage Fair will take place on 22nd & 23rd June 2023.
For more infor… https://t.co/djaN5RC6Gs Kings Chambers 4 days, 6 hours ago..
Andrew Hogan & Craig Ralph undertake their annual review of current issues in PI costs including QOCS, fixed costs,… https://t.co/qQnnlhwmRf Kings Chambers 6 days, 23 hours ago..
The second in our employment law webinar series sees Laura Gould provide an overview of a modern understanding of n… https://t.co/YO39TWdoLY Kings Chambers 1 week, 3 days ago..
In the latest Kings Chambers Costs Newsletter Andrew Hogan considers recent developments in QOCS including a number… https://t.co/boFNieoFr7 Kings Chambers 1 week, 4 days ago..
For #InternationalWomensDay 2023, we want to take the opportunity to celebrate the achievements of our female membe… https://t.co/KfZisnct3f Kings Chambers 1 week, 5 days ago..
© Copyright 2023 Kings Chambers. All rights reserved.