Freddie Humphreys has successfully appeared on behalf of Stoke-on-Trent City Council in a case stated concerned with a prosecution brought for breach of a planning enforcement notice.
The Appellant had been convicted in the Magistrates Court for failing to comply with the terms of an enforcement notice. The enforcement notice had alleged a breach of planning control which stemmed from construction works to a residential property in a conservation area in breach of an Article 4 Direction. The Appellant’s defence to the charge had been to argue that the Council couldn’t prove that an Article 4 Direction was in place and so he couldn’t be guilty of an offence. This contention was rejected and the Justices found that on the balance of probability the Council had proved the existence of the Article 4 Direction on the balance of probabilities.
The Appellant applied to the Justices to state a case to the High Court, which they did raising two questions:
The Council resisted the challenge to the decision of the Magistrates by arguing that the questions didn’t arise. S.285 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 was engaged in this case and what the Appellant was in reality seeking to do was challenging the validity of the Enforcement Notice. That was not open to him to do and the matter for the courts to consider when determining the prosecution should have been limited to the simple question of whether the enforcement notice had been breached.
Stoke’s arguments were accepted by the High Court with Mr Justice Knowles finding:“It follows that, I consider that the questions posed by the justices for this Court’s opinion do not arise. The justices were not concerned with the existence or otherwise of an Article 4 Direction: the Enforcement Notice was valid, and the only issue for them was whether the Appellant had breached it. As to that, there was only one answer. He plainly had.”
The decision should be of some utility to LPA’s looking to bring prosecutions for breach of enforcement notices, confirming the scope of what is required to be proved in such prosecutions.
The judgment can be found at: https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2020/3249.html&query=(zafar)
Freddie Humphreys was instructed by Trevor Vernon on behalf of Stoke-on-Trent City Council.
36 Young Street, Manchester, M3 3FT
DX: 718188 MCH 3
Direct Dial: 0161 832 9082
5 Park Square, Leeds, LS1 2NE
DX: 713113 LEEDS PARK SQ
Direct Dial: 0113 242 1123
Embassy House, 60 Church Street,
Birmingham, B3 2DJ
DX: 13023 BIRMINGHAM
Direct Dial: 0121 200 3570
Expert evidence is a common and, in most instances helpful, feature of modern litigation and arbitration. Mark Har… https://t.co/vW5NxE69lI Kings Chambers 5 days, 6 hours ago..
Appeal Decision is Veritable Smorgasbord of Planning Delights...
Read more: https://t.co/KFpBG4Gmf7 https://t.co/rE1hPTJ1Kv Kings Chambers 1 week ago..
Killian Garvey (@kingsplanner) successfully defends the service of an enforcement notice by North Northamptonshire… https://t.co/Qi7VFs1uba Kings Chambers 2 weeks, 3 days ago..
Ian Ponter: Another View of Green Belt Openness
An appeal made against an enforcement notice in an effort to retai… https://t.co/pT4N3TviiH Kings Chambers 3 weeks, 3 days ago..
There is still time to book for the 'Aspects of Property Fraud' Blundell lecture with Lesley Anderson QC (… https://t.co/0Hwvvj48p0 Kings Chambers 3 weeks, 5 days ago..
© Copyright 2021 Kings Chambers. All rights reserved.
Please click here to view our current guidelines
Continue using site