The High Court considered the disregard provisions in Sched 4 to the 1992 Regulations and concluded that ‘home’ for the purposes of paragraph 2 should be read as ‘main or only home’. It is also held that a local authority may have to review whether it was being occupied as such at any time after the resident went into care. This raises a serious concern for local authorities who may be faced with relatives or others moving in after the resident goes into care and then claiming that the property has become their ‘main’ home. The potential financial consequences for local authorities are significant.

Adam Fullwood at Kings Chambers, represented the local authority


The Times:


Kings Chambers News

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)