Year of call: 2002 | Year of silk: 2017
Sheikh Mohammed Samiul Karim KC (Sam Karim KC) is dynamic silk who is regarded as a leading practitioner by legal commentators who say that, “When he is on his feet in a courtroom, he is simply captivating.”, he is “an outstanding advocate….and one of the leading practitioners”, and that he remains “remarkably calm and in control, he never gets fazed by the complexities of a case”. It is also said that “… His academic understanding of subject matter litigation is incredible.”.
He is specialist areas are four-fold:
(a) Domestic and international commercial arbitration in which he acts as counsel and sits as panel or sole arbitrator;
(b) Procurement;
(c) Judicial Review and Human Rights / Civil Liberties; and
Sam is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and is admitted as a practitioner in the Dubai International Finance Centre (DIFC) Court.
Sam Karim KC is the head of the Administrative Law & Local Government Team at Kings Chambers.
Sam has been consistently recommended in this area as a leading specialist, and had been a member of the Attorney General Panel of Regional Counsel representing central government for almost a decade in cases of significance.
He is a well-known author in this field: (1) ‘public law online’, and online based legal knowledge database, (2) a book ‘Judicial Review: Law & Practice’, which is currently in its second edition and the co-author being the late Mrs Justice Patterson, and (3) the chapter on judicial review in Bullen & Leake & Jacob’s Precedents of Pleadings.
Commercial disputes arising from performance of government contracts such as benchmarking,
Market testing and performance issues,
Concessions and part B contracts,
Health service procurement, and outside the EU,
Project finance and PFI/PPP matters,
Regeneration schemes, procurement by EU institutions, and
State aid and procurement and utilities procurement.
Sam is a specialist lawyer in domestic and international commercial arbitration. He acts as counsel and sits as a panel or sole arbitrator. He is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (MCIArb) and is admitted as a practitioner in the Dubai International Finance Centre Court and the Abu Dhabi Global Markets. He is fully conversant in arbitrations under the AAA, Court of Arbitration for Sport, HKIAC, SIAC, ICC, LCIA, ARIAS, UNCITRAL and ICSID, as well as ad hoc arbitrations pursuant to the Arbitration Act 1996, particularly in the Middle East and Brazil.
Specific areas of Sam’s work includes: (1) Investment Arbitration, (2) Energy Charter, (3) Treaty Arbitration, (4) WTO Arbitration, (5) Construction & Engineering, (6) Energy & Natural Resources, (7) Oil & Gas, Mining, (8) IT & IP, (9) Shipping, (10) Law of the Sea, (11) International Trade, Trade Finance, and (12) Islamic finance.
His expertise is demonstrated and recognised by his invitations to speak at leading global conferences, a few examples include:
Sam is also an author in this area, some examples include:
Sam is the head of the Court of Protection team at Kings Chambers. He has been a specialist in this area since the advent of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and has been at the forefront of developing case law in this jurisdiction since the implementation of the Act, for instance:
(a) All types of disputes regarding the social welfare of incapacitated adults and children and medical treatment issues, and is regularly instructed by the Official Solicitor, families of patients, CCG’s, local authorities and private care providers.
(b) Urgent applications for life saving medical treatment, non-urgent medical treatment, “end of life” withdrawal of medical treatment, treatment of suicidal patients (including emergency treatment following overdose) and advanced directives, and
(c) Property and affairs. He has extensive in appearing on contested applications for deputyships and on issues arising during deputyship and for registration of lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) and enduring powers of attorney (EPAs), and advising on issues arising for attorneys and in relation to disputed statutory will. His experience also includes advising and appearing in cases relating to the overlap of the Court of Protection and personal injury proceedings.
Sam undertakes urgent advice and representation on applications including declarations on an emergency basis. Please contact his Clerks.
His is also published in this area, a precise includes: (a) End of life Decisions in ‘Tolley’s Finance and Law for the Older Client’, and (b) ‘A human rights perspective on reducing restrictive practices in intellectual disability and autism’ (BILD).
Re BG [2019] EWCOP 19: the Court (it appears for the first time) is tasked with deciding whether a young adult should be provided serious medical treatment to achieve puberty, contrary to their express wish
Re B [2019] EWCA Civ 913: arguably redefined the test for capacity in relation to residence and consent to sexual relations
Re B (Capacity: Social Media, Care & Contact) [2019] EWCOP 3: first case deal with the relevant information need to make decisions about use of the internet and social media
CH v. A Metropolitan Council [2017] EWCOP 12: case relating to damages for the failure to provide education to promote P\s ability to gain capacity to make decisions about consenting to sexual relations
North Cumbria University NHS Foundation Trust & Anor[2017] EWCOP 1 782 (Holman J): successfully obtained declarations that in relation to serious medical treatment, namely the removal of Basal Cell Carcinomas
Secretary of State for Justice v Staffordshire County Council & Anor[2016] EWCA Civ 1317: successfully defended an appeal relating to the definition of a deprivation of liberty in relation to packages of care with no direct state involvement. See also first instance decision, [2016] EWCOP 27 (Charles J)
AP v.Tameside MBC[2017] EWHC 65 (QB): defined the parameters of extending the statutory time limit for bringing a claim under the Human Rights Act 1998 for a breach of Article 5 of the ECHR, arising out of an deprivation of liberty that was not authorised
Bristol NHS Trust v. AB[2016] 1 EWCOP 67 (Baker J): successfully obtained declarations that in relation to serious medical treatment, namely the removal of cancer
BMC v. ST[2015] EWCOP 456 (Holman J): definition of sexual capacity deploying novel arguments relying on personal reproductive autonomy
County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust[2014] All ER (D) 06: successfully obtained declarations to withdrawn life sustaining treatment (artificial nutrition and resuscitation) on the basis that it would be futile, would not result in a therapeutic benefit and would not be in the patient's best interests
An NHS Foundation Trust[2014] All ER (D) 92: successfully obtained declarations to withdrawn life sustaining treatment (artificial nutrition) on the basis that it would be futile, would not result in a therapeutic benefit and would not be in the patient's best interests
CP[2012] EWHC 1944 (Admin) & [2012] EWHC 1944 (Costs) (Ryder J as he then was). The 'blue room case' which was the first decision of its kind dealing with issues of seclusion, restraint and sought to define what amounted to a deprivation of liberty (under Article 5 of the ECHR) for those who have a diagnosis of intellectual disability and autism
MB & Others[2009] EWHC 1686 (Fam) & [2009] EWHC 2061 (Fam): defined the appropriateness of P’s deputy for property and affairs instigating welfare proceedings
Sam is a specialist in coronial law.
He is regularly instructed in inquests and inquiries for, individual interested persons, for public/corporate bodies, and families. His experience includes. ‘Article 2’ inquests following deaths in prison, after police contact or in psychiatric detention. Sam has experience of inquests following death in custody, in a health setting, in the work place, in a holiday or leisure setting and transport -related deaths. His recent experience includes a high-profile case involving a man who had committed suicide following significant failures in his psychiatric care, and a patient who died in hospital in which a finding of neglect was made.
In HM Coroner County Durham & Darlington [2014] EWHC 3688 (Admin), Sam successfully made an application by Mr Andrew Tweddle (Senior Coroner for the Coroner area of County Durham Darlington) with the fiat of the Attorney‑General. The question was whether the existence of new information should result in the matter being remitted.
He is also routinely instructed to advise upon and act in public inquiries, in particular inquiries arising from catastrophic health and safety failures in public bodies that have resulted in fatalities and serious injuries.
Sam is the head of the Administrative Law & Local Government Team at Kings Chambers. He has been consistently recommended in this area as a leading specialist and had been a member of the Attorney General Panel of Regional Counsel representing central government for almost a decade in cases of significance. Sam has been recognised as the “driving force behind the development of administrative law” in the regions.
He is a well-known author in this field, a sample of his publications include: (1) ‘public law online’, and online based legal knowledge database, (2) Patterson & Karim (3rd Edition) ‘Judicial Review: Law & Practice’, and (3) the chapter on judicial review in Bullen & Leake & Jacob’s Precedents of Pleadings.
Sam is also the administrator and founding member of the Public Law Pro Bono Scheme, which provides free legal advice on public law matters, including representation at renewal hearings at the Administrative Court in Manchester.
As a silk his specialist practice includes:
(a) Commercial judicial review and public procurement. His experience includes:
(b) Regulatory and disciplinary. He has experience in:
(c) Employment: advising local government on disciplinary and employment law compliance issues and Equality Act duties. Sam has provided advice on the implementation and proper conduct of disciplinary and capability procedures in relation to senior managers in local government and advised on the lawfulness and application of voluntary severance and early retirement provisions to senior management team members in local government.
(d) Data protection, freedom of information, human rights issues, privacy and breach of confidence. Sam has advised a wide range of public sector and commercial organisations regarding their use of personal information, and relating the implications of sharing confidential personal sensitive information with other public authorities for the prevention of crime and fraud. He has experience of RIPA at the First-Tier Tribunal, and in appeals from that Tribunal, and also appearing in the county court in proceedings under the DPA 1998 for public and private sector data controllers. Sam was recently a keynote speaker on Data Protection Compliance for the European Fraud Network in Brussels.
(e) Immigration, nationality and prison. His extensive experience derives from representing central government for a decade in this in cases of significance (see below).
(f) Community care and health care law. Sam has also advised on: (1) The adequacy of assessments and care plans for the provision of residential care, (2) Good practice in the provision of services to vulnerable adults and children in a residential setting, (3) Health issues in residential care homes, and (4) Demarcation of responsibilities between local authorities, health care providers and other service providers.
Significant reported cases include:
Dong v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 3100 (Admin). Whether the period of grant in respect of discretionary leave was appropriate in the circumstances
Aziz v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2589. A challenge to the lawfulness of the decision relating to Tier 1 Post Study Work pursuant to Part 6A of the Immigration Rules
Peters v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 1336 (Admin). Whether the defendant’s decision to grant discretionary leave rather than indefinite leave was lawful or not
R (1st Choice Engines Limited) v. the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2014 EWHC 1765 (Admin). Considering whether the decision made by the defendant in relation to a notie pursuant to sections 447 and 452A of the Companies Act 1985 was lawful or not
HM Coroner County Durham & Darlington [2014] EWHC 3688 (Admin): application is made by the Senior Coroner for the Coroner area of County Durham Darlington with thefiat of the Attorney
SN v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 1111 (Admin). Whether the defendant’s decision to certify under was section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was lawful or not.
Jaferi v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1275 (Admin). Legacy case
MJ (Iraq) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 932. Delay and whether the Claimant would have benefited from the earlier policy towards asylum seekers
R (Kheirollahi-Ahmadroghani) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1314 (Admin). Council Regulation (EC) No343/2003 of 18 February 2003 ("the Dublin II Regulation
R (Touray) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC. Challenge to request for further leave
R (Khan) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 3430(Admin). Article 8
Reed v. Parole Board [2013] EWHC 3329 (Admin). Refusal to make recommendations to release
Thomas v. Parole Board [2013] EWHC 2112 (Admin). Refusal to transfer a prisoner to open conditions, and also not to provide an oral hearing pursuant to Article 5 of the ECHR
R (Simpson) v. Governor of HMP Wakefield [2013] EWHC 2652 (Admin). Entitlements under the Prison Rules
R (Bibi) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 671 (Admin). Nationality
R (Smith) v. Parole Board [2013] EWHC 218 (Admin). Transfer to open condition and the requirement to undertake balancing exercise
R (Amin) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 2813 (Admin). Domestic violence and indefinite leave to remain under IR 289
A [2012] EWCA 1879 (Fam). Data Protection and Freedom of Information. Redaction and disclosure of personal sensitive information to a third party and a disciplinary body
R (M) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1244.Deportation, detention and reasonable prospect of removing a deportee within a reasonable time
R (S) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2825 (Admin). Certification
R (Manchester College of Higher Education& Media Technology) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1463 (Admin). Sponsor under the tier based system
R (Ajibade) v. The Nursing and Midwifery Council [2012] EWHC 2790 (Admin). Disqualification
R (Ian Morris) v. Chester West & Cheshire Council [2012] EWHC 3016 (Admin). Non-Domestic Rates Liability Order
R (Jalal) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 4035 (Admin). Delay and whether the Claimant would have benefited from the earlier policy towards asylum seekers
R (Riley) v Upper Tribunal [2012]EWHC 3436 (Admin). Article 8
R (Cardao-Pito) v. Office of Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2012] EWHC 203 (Admin). Complaint to the Adjudicator regarding the treatment of a pupil at a university
R (Tologiwa) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2386 (Admin). Certification
R (Fox) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 2411 (Admin). Oral hearing entitlement
Al-Halal & Wajid Ali v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 128. Costs under the civil penalty regime for employing illegal migrant workers
R (Kaur) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] All ER (D) 68. Certification
R (Adetola) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department[2010] All ER (D) 145. 3197 (Admin). Marriage and evidence
R (Austin) v. Parole Board [2011] EWHC 128 (Admin). Open transfer and balancing exercise
R (Leach) v. Parole Board [2011] EWHC 2470 (Admin). Open transfer and balancing exercise
R (D’Cunha) v. Parole Board [2011] EWHC 128 (Admin). Open transfer and balancing exercise
R (Jacob) v Parole Board [2010] EWHC 2475 (Admin) & [2010] EWHC 3035 (Admin). Release and oral hearing
R (Akram) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3437 (Admin). Article 8
R (Ahmed) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2779 (Admin). Sufficiency of protection
R (Da Costa) v Secretary of State for the Home Department[2010] EWHC 2259 (Admin). Further leave to remain and evidential requirement
R (Alam) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1303 (Admin)
R (Mohamed) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1244 (Admin). Deportation and Article 8
R (Sanyalou) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC B9 (Admin). Certification
R (Howden) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] All ER 140 (D). Release on licence and recall
R (McDonagh) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 369 (Admin). Release on licence and recall
R (Byran) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2507 (Admin). Contact with children, prisoner and Article 8
R (Westwater) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2403 (Admin). Contact with children, prisoner and Article 8
R (Sarwat) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] All ER (D) 316. EWHC 2825 (Admin). Fresh claim
R (AS) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWHC 1315 (Admin). Licence and recall
R (Boswell) v. The Parole Board & Secretary of State for Justice [2009]All ER (D) 176. Right to speedy review of lawfulness of detention
R (Hinds) v Liverpool City Council [2008] EWHC 665 (QB), 1 FLR 475. Care proceedings, contact and Article 8
R (J) v. The Healthy Futures Joint Committee of PCT & Others [2007] EWCA 1611 (Admin). Reconfiguration of health care services and consultation
Sam is able to deal with all aspects of licensing work including: premises licences (for sale of alcohol and entertainment), betting shops and bookmakers, gaming (bingo and casinos), street trading, gangmasters, taxis and environmental waste.
Sam recently successfully obtained injunctive proceedings regarding unauthorised traveller encampments on land owned by a Council. Arguments were raised in respect of an alleged unlawful interference of Articles 8 and 14.
He was also involved in the only case involving the Gangmasters Licencing Authority in the Administrative Court, A Company v. Gangmasters Licencing Authority [2014] EWHC 4910 (Admin) where he successfully sought interim relief to reinstate a licence following revocation pending a determination by an Appointed Person.
“he knows his stuff when it comes to judicial review – [one person said] I wish he was a worse opponent.”
(Chambers and Partners, 2016)
“… a seasoned hand at representing both claimants and defendants in judicial review proceedings….”.
(Chambers and Partners, 2015)
“[he]… has an excellent public law practice that involves handling judicial reviews for central government and other defendants in the areas of community care and human rights generally.”
(Chambers and Partners, 2015)
“was… a driving force behind the development of administrative law in the North West generally”.
(Chambers and Partners, 2013)
Sam Karim KC is the head of the Administrative Law & Local Government Team at Kings Chambers.
Sam has been consistently recommended in this area as a leading specialist, and had been a member of the Attorney General Panel of Regional Counsel representing central government for almost a decade in cases of significance.
He is a well-known author in this field: (1) ‘public law online’, and online based legal knowledge database, (2) a book ‘Judicial Review: Law & Practice’, which is currently in its second edition and the co-author being Mrs Justice Patterson, and (3) the chapter on judicial review in Bullen & Leake & Jacob’s Precedents of Pleadings.
Sam is also the administrator and founding member of the Public Law Pro Bono Scheme, which provides free legal advice on public law matters, including representation at renewal hearings at the Administrative Court in Manchester.
As a silk his specialist practice includes:
(a) Commercial judicial review and public procurement. His experience includes:
i. Commercial disputes arising from performance of government contracts such as benchmarking,
ii. Market testing and performance issues,
iii. Concessions and part B contracts,
iv. Health service procurement, and outside the EU,
v. Project finance and PFI/PPP matters, R
vi. Regeneration schemes, P
vii. rocurement by EU institutions,
viii. State aid and procurement and
ix. Utilities procurement,
(b) Regulatory and disciplinary. He has experience in:
i. Professional Disciplinary Hearings, e.g. relating to accountants, solicitors, healthcare professionals (GMC and GDC) and
police officers,
ii. Breaches of planning regulations, fly tipping, Medicines Act breaches, trading standards, food standards and
environmental offences,
iii. Care Standards Tribunal,
iv. Immigration Services Tribunal,
v. General Social Care Council,
vi. Represented former Primary Care Trusts in hearings before the Family Health Services Appeal Unit (FHSAU), and
vii. Civil penalty regimes, such as the regime for employing illegal migrant workers
(c) Employment: advising local government on disciplinary and employment law compliance issues and Equality Act duties. Sam has provided advice on the implementation and proper conduct of disciplinary and capability procedures in relation to senior managers in local government and advised on the lawfulness and application of voluntary severance and early retirement provisions to senior management team members in local government.
(d) Data protection, freedom of information, human rights issues, privacy and breach of confidence. Sam has advised a wide range of public sector and commercial organisations regarding their use of personal information, and relating the implications of sharing confidential personal sensitive information with other public authorities for the prevention of crime and fraud. He has experience of RIPA at the First-Tier Tribunal, and in appeals from that Tribunal, and also appearing in the county court in proceedings under the DPA 1998 for public and private sector data controllers. Sam was recently a keynote speaker on Data Protection Compliance for the European Fraud Network in Brussels.
(e) Immigration, nationality and prison. His extensive experience derives from representing central government for a decade in this in cases of significance (see below).
(f) Community care and health care law.
Significant reported cases include:
Dong v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 3100 (Admin). Whether the period of grant in respect of discretionary leave was appropriate in the circumstances.
Aziz v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2589. A challenge to the lawfulness of the decision relating to Tier 1 Post Study Work pursuant to Part 6A of the Immigration Rules.
Peters v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 1336 (Admin). Whether the defendant’s decision to grant discretionary leave rather than indefinite leave was lawful or not.
R (1st Choice Engines Limited) v. the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2014 EWHC 1765 (Admin). Considering whether the decision made by the defendant in relation to a notie pursuant to sections 447 and 452A of the Companies Act 1985 was lawful or not.
HM Coroner County Durham & Darlington [2014] EWHC 3688 (Admin): application is made by the Senior Coroner for the Coroner area of County Durham Darlington with the fiat of the Attorney‑
SN v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 1111 (Admin). Whether the defendant’s decision to certify under was section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was lawful or not.
Jaferi v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1275 (Admin). Legacy case.
MJ (Iraq) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 932. Delay and whether the Claimant would have benefited from the earlier policy towards asylum seekers.
R (Kheirollahi-Ahmadroghani) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1314 (Admin). Council Regulation (EC) No343/2003 of 18 February 2003 ("the Dublin II Regulation
R (Touray) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC. Challenge to request for further leave
R (Khan) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 3430(Admin). Article 8.
Reed v. Parole Board [2013] EWHC 3329 (Admin). Refusal to make recommendations to release.
Thomas v. Parole Board [2013] EWHC 2112 (Admin). Refusal to transfer a prisoner to open conditions, and also not to provide an oral hearing pursuant to Article 5 of the ECHR.
R (Simpson) v. Governor of HMP Wakefield [2013] EWHC 2652 (Admin). Entitlements under the Prison Rules.
R (Bibi) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 671 (Admin). Nationality.
R (Smith) v. Parole Board [2013] EWHC 218 (Admin). Transfer to open condition and the requirement to undertake balancing exercise.
R (Amin) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 2813 (Admin). Domestic violence and indefinite leave to remain under IR 289.
A [2012] EWCA 1879 (Fam). Data Protection and Freedom of Information. Redaction and disclosure of personal sensitive information to a third party and a disciplinary body.
R (M) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1244.Deportation, detention and reasonable prospect of removing a deportee within a reasonable time.
R (S) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2825 (Admin). Certification.
R (Manchester College of Higher Education& Media Technology) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1463 (Admin). Sponsor under the tier based system.
R (Ajibade) v. The Nursing and Midwifery Council [2012] EWHC 2790 (Admin). Disqualification.
R (Ian Morris) v. Chester West & Cheshire Council [2012] EWHC 3016 (Admin). Non-Domestic Rates Liability Order.
R (Jalal) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 4035 (Admin). Delay and whether the Claimant would have benefited from the earlier policy towards asylum seekers.
R (Riley) v Upper Tribunal [2012]EWHC 3436 (Admin). Article 8.
R (Cardao-Pito) v. Office of Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2012] EWHC 203 (Admin). Complaint to the Adjudicator regarding the treatment of a pupil at a university.
R (Tologiwa) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2386 (Admin). Certification.
R (Fox) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 2411 (Admin). Oral hearing entitlement.
Al-Halal & Wajid Ali v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 128. Costs under the civil penalty regime for employing illegal migrant workers.
R (Kaur) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] All ER (D) 68. Certification.
R (Adetola) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department[2010] All ER (D) 145. 3197 (Admin). Marriage and evidence.
R (Austin) v. Parole Board [2011] EWHC 128 (Admin). Open transfer and balancing exercise.
R (Leach) v. Parole Board [2011] EWHC 2470 (Admin). Open transfer and balancing exercise.
R (D’Cunha) v. Parole Board [2011] EWHC 128 (Admin). Open transfer and balancing exercise.
R (Jacob) v Parole Board [2010] EWHC 2475 (Admin) & [2010] EWHC 3035 (Admin). Release and oral hearing.
R (Akram) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3437 (Admin). Article 8.
R (Ahmed) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2779 (Admin). Sufficiency of protection.
R (Da Costa) v Secretary of State for the Home Department[2010] EWHC 2259 (Admin). Further leave to remain and evidential requirement.
R (Alam) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1303 (Admin).
R (Mohamed) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1244 (Admin). Deportation and Article 8.
R (Sanyalou) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC B9 (Admin). Certification.
R (Howden) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] All ER 140 (D). Release on licence and recall.
R (McDonagh) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 369 (Admin). Release on licence and recall.
R (Byran) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2507 (Admin). Contact with children, prisoner and Article 8.
R (Westwater) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2403 (Admin). Contact with children, prisoner and Article 8.
R (Sarwat) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] All ER (D) 316. EWHC 2825 (Admin). Fresh claim.
R (AS) v. Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWHC 1315 (Admin). Licence and recall.
R (Boswell) v. The Parole Board & Secretary of State for Justice [2009]All ER (D) 176. Right to speedy review of lawfulness of detention
R (Hinds) v Liverpool City Council [2008] EWHC 665 (QB), 1 FLR 475. Care proceedings, contact and Article 8.
R (J) v. The Healthy Futures Joint Committee of PCT & Others [2007] EWCA 1611 (Admin). Reconfiguration of health care services and consultation.
Sam has specific expertise in public procurement and State Aid having been involved in Lancashire County Council [2018] EWHC 200 (TCC).
His specialist practice includes:
Sam is a procurement specialist being ideally placed with expertise in public and commercial laws. He specialises in:
Sam is also the author of commercial judicial review & procurement law in the 3rd Edition of Patterson & Karim on Judicial Review: Law & Practice.
Acted for the Claimants alleging that a private body was subject to the PCR as a contracting authority and/or alternatively that an implied/express contract existed and/or that the decision was amenable to judicial review
Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust & Anor v Lancashire County Council [2018] EWHC 200 (TCC) relating to an application to lift an automatic stay under Regulation 96 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. This was also the first High Court decision post Nuclear Decommissioning Authority vEnergySolutions EU Ltd (now called ATK Energy EU Ltd) [2017] UKSC 34
Acted for the Defendants concerning alleged breaches of obligations of equal treatment and transparency in the application in an allegedly abnormally low tender. This case was settled on confidential terms
Acted for a Claimant in an alleged purported abnormally low tender and lifting of the statutory suspension
Acted for the Defendant in proceedings concerning a claim for damages in respect of alleged breaches of EU law in the rejection of a tender as non-compliant
Acted for the Claimant in relation to a challenge procurement of children’s services in the North West
Acted for the Defendant in relation to a lifted suspension and third-party disclosure
‘Sam is conscientious, level headed, excellent with clients, and able to utilise his skills and expertise to get a point across when required.’
‘He is highly professional and builds a great rapport with clients. He is calm, reassuring, and unflappable, his advocacy is outstanding and his written submissions are clear, concise and demonstrate in-depth knowledge.’
‘Sam is pragmatic, patient, and extremely knowledgeable, and is a really safe pair of hands. His advocacy is engaging, witnesses will trust him, and he is able to tease information out that others may not.’
‘Sam is excellent with clients, as he has a lovely manner and is very likeable, and at the same time, he is extremely sharp and an exemplary advocate. His calm approach is very reassuring and he is very easy to work with.
(Legal 500 2025)
“Sam always makes himself available and is highly skilled.”
(Chambers UK 2025)
‘Sam is an excellent advocate. He remains very calm under pressure and speaks very eloquently. He is extremely good at dealing with clients, always on hand to assist and very approachable.’
“Sam is very sensible, calm and effective.”
“Sam is a really good opponent.”
“Sam is an excellent advocate and is extremely eloquent. He deals really well with clients and is friendly and approachable. He is a pleasure to work with.”
(Chambers UK 2024)
“Sam is an absolute genius at cross-examination. He immediately brings a calmness to proceedings.”
“He is outstanding; fantastic with clients, easily accessible and highly knowledgeable.”
(Chambers UK 2023)
‘An outstanding advocate. He has a wonderful bedside manner and is very reassuring to clients.’
“Sam is calm under pressure, very sharp intellectually and is able to quickly analyse issues. He is not afraid to deal with difficult issues.'”
‘Sam is an incredibly diligent barrister with a real skill in getting to the crux of the issues in the case swiftly. As an advocate, he is concise, pragmatic and focused in his drafting and as a result has no need to deliver his clear and succinct submissions forcefully or aggressively to aid persuasion. Sam is equally skilled at identifying legal arguments that require adjudication of the court.’
(Legal 500 2023)
“A pleasure to be against. He never loses his calm and is trusted by the judges in the Court of Protection.” “He has a well-deserved reputation for acting in high-profile and interesting cases.”
(Chambers UK 2022)
“Sam is an incredibly diligent barrister with a real skill in getting to the crux of the issues in the case swiftly. As an advocate he is concise, pragmatic and focused in his drafting and as a result has no need to deliver his clear and succinct submissions forcefully or aggressively to aid persuasion. Sam is equally skilled at identifying legal arguments that require adjudication of the court.”
(Legal 500 2022)
“He’s a very good advocate who makes very focused submissions.”
(Chambers UK 2021)
“His advice is always very thorough and his advocacy is very effective.” “His softly-spoken manner makes him ideal for dealing with vulnerable clients, and belies a razor-sharp advocacy which is effective and persuasive. He sees the issues with a clarity that compares with few others and is a pleasure to work with.” “Excellent on his feet, very knowledgeable and approachable.”
(Chambers UK 2021)
“He is a very polished, attractive advocate.” “He is calm, methodical and committed to delivering the best result for those instructing him.” “He has a good client manner and excellent subject matter knowledge. He is also a quick thinker on his feet.”
(Chambers UK 2021)
“He is an articulate, persuasive advocate and has the ability to charm litigation friends.”
(Legal 500, 2020)
“Excellent client manner and ability to explain often complex legal points in client friendly terms. Responsive and able to turn work around quickly when needed. Quick thinking, particularly when on feet in Court.”
(Legal 500, 2020)
“Has in-depth knowledge in Court of Protection, and is very efficient and proactive in his approach.”
(Legal 500, 2020)
“Proactive and knowledgeable.”
(Legal 500, 2020)
“An extremely able advocate who can think on his feet.”
(Legal 500, 2020)
“His advocacy is clear, concise, accurate and calm under pressure. He’s very punctual as well.”
“He’s unflappable and very good at dealing with people.” “He’s very dedicated, researches his cases very thoroughly and really gets to grips with the main issues. He’s a pleasure to work with.” “He’s knowledgeable, articulate in court and a very safe pair of hands.”
(Chambers & Partners, 2020)
“Sam is an outstanding advocate. He is a pleasure to work with. He is always on hand at the drop of a hat to discuss a case, and he has an ability to put lay clients completely at ease even when dealing with difficult medical decisions.”
“He understands the technical points of public law really well.” “He is diligent and straight-dealing.”
“He has a real breadth of knowledge. He is a measured and careful advocate.” “He has a good knowledge of the law and is well-prepared. His submissions are underpinned by a knowledge of the law.”
(Chambers & Partners, 2018)
‘An outstanding advocate.’
(Legal 500, 2018)
‘An outstanding advocate, who makes lay clients feel completely at ease.’
(Legal 500, 2018)
“Accomplished new silk”
(Chambers & Partners, 2017)
“When he is on his feet in a courtroom, he is simply captivating.”
(Legal 500, 2016)
“He’s excellent, and used by all parties – he’s very academic in his thought processes.”
(Chambers and Partners, 2016)
“… His academic understanding of subject matter litigation is incredible.”
(Chambers and Partners, 2015)
“He is one of the leading practitioners in the North”
(Chambers & Partners, 2017)
“He is innovative in the way he approaches cases and creative in the way he deals with matters…”
(Chambers and Partners, 2015)
“He’s a very skilful advocate who is always remarkably calm and in control, he never gets fazed by the complexities of a case… He puts his points across succinctly and never wavers.”
(Chambers & Partners, 2017)