Richard Livingston

Richard Livingston Occupational Disease Barrister


36 Young Street, Manchester, M3 3FT
DX: 718188 MCH 3
Direct Dial: 0161 832 9082


5 Park Square, Leeds, LS1 2NE
Direct Dial: 0113 242 1123


Embassy House, 60 Church Street,
Birmingham, B3 2DJ
Direct Dial: 0121 200 3570

Clerked by:
Stephen Loxton
Paul Clarke

Richard Livingston Occupational Disease Barrister

Significant Reported Cases

Richard has recently been involved in the litigation and conclusion of the following cases which are notable either due to their value or nature of the issues involved (the names of the parties have been anonymised):

Richard is instructed as Junior Counsel in the Aerotoxicity Litigation. The Claimants comprise pilots and cabin crew who have been allegedly exposed to partially pyrolised engine oil/hydraulic fluid containing mixtures of Organophosphates (led by Michael Rawlinson QC). Richard also secured substantial pre-action disclosure at a contested hearing before a Deputy Judge of the High Court Hinton v Thomas Cook Airlines Ltd (Reported on Lawtel 2018 and contains a full review of the relevant authorities).

Representing a living Claimant diagnosed with mesothelioma.  Liability and diagnosis disputed. The Defendant sought to extend Williams v University of Birmingham to 1982. The case settled shortly at its full value shortly before an expedited High Court Trial (led by Michael Rawlinson QC).

Acting for the Dependents of lung cancer victim. A claim for pleural plaques was compromised for notional damages against one employer during the Deceased’s lifetime. This compromise did not allow for provisional damages. The Deceased’s Estate subsequently issued a claim against another employer following his death. The Defendant argues: Accord and Satisfaction; Abuse of Process/Issue Estoppel in line with Jameson v CEGB [2000] and seeks to challenge Dowdell v William Kenyon [2014] and Lloyd v Humphreys & Glasgow Ltd [2015]. The case settled shortly before a 5-day High Court Trial (led by Harry Steinberg QC).

Acting for a Claimant who suffered mesothelioma as a consequence of exposure to asbestos dust in Sicily. Involved issues of jurisdiction and conflict of laws (led by Michael Rawlinson QC).

Richard is instructed by the Defendant in a claim for asbestos-related lung cancer in a claim pleaded in excess of £2.4 million, where a 40-year-old living Claimant alleged exposure to asbestos as a labourer from 1994 – 2005 Taylor v Fascia Futures Ltd [2018] EWHC 3049 (QB). Richard acted alone against a QC and junior.

Acted for the Dependents of an engineer who succumbed to mesothelioma. The case settled shortly before a 5-day trial. The case involved issues of the correct approach to Williams v University of Birmingham and whether the (then) traditional approach to a dependency claim under Cookson v Knowles should continue to apply (led by Michael Rawlinson QC).

Acting without a leader in numerous cases where the Claimant has succumbed to mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer. Many of these cases exceed £1 million.

Secured substantial settlement for the family of a mesothelioma victim who successfully sued the demolition firm of whom the victim was director and the local authority who regularly engaged that company.

Secured settlement in numerous claims for living mesothelioma victims where the funding of immunotherapy treatment is contested.

Acting for several Claimants who have developed nasal cancer as a consequence of exposure to wood dust.

Acting for a Defendant in an important appeal relating to the approach that should be taken at a show cause hearing in a mesothelioma case - Austin v Plumb Furniture Systems Ltd (Reported on Lawtel).

Acting for a Defendant in a living mesothelioma claim where the Claimant’s exposure took place pre-1975. The case was successfully defended on the basis that the Claimant’s exposure to asbestos was so light as to not give rise to a foreseeable risk of injury.

Acting for Defendants in a large number mesothelioma claim where issues arise as to the date of knowledge of exposure to low levels of asbestos in the motor repair industry.

Acting for a Defendant in a silicosis trial where the allegation was raised that the Claimant had suffered no actionable injury on the basis that his condition was asymptomatic - Mills v J P Barnes & Sons Ltd (Reported on Lawtel).


Richard specialises in all aspects of Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence work. His practice encompasses injuries of the utmost severity, and he regularly acts without a leader in cases where the value is pleaded well in excess £7,000,000. His cases regularly involve orders for periodical payments, accommodation claims and lifelong provision for care and assistance.

He has secured millions of pounds of compensation for seriously injured Claimants and their Dependants. He also defends cases of similar value at Trial and at Joint Settlement Meetings for numerous Insurers, Medical  and Dental Defence Organisations, Defendant Health Trusts, and the Motor Insurers Bureau. He has secured substantial awards before the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority where the damages initially awarded were inadequate.

Richard has developed a substantial reputation in the field of Occupational Disease. He is regularly instructed by Claimants and Defendants alike in claims involving benign and malignant asbestos-related conditions (pleural thickening, asbestosis, asbestos-related lung cancer, mesothelioma), asthma, chemical exposure (COSHH claims), and occupational stress/harassment. He is on several Insurers’ panels.

He frequently advises on claims for contribution between insurers and medical defence organisations.

Richard also has a substantial professional negligence practice in the context of negligently mishandled personal injury and clinical negligence actions.

He regularly appears without a leader in cases against QCs. He is regarded as having a practice well beyond his call.

Year of Call: 2006

Areas of Expertise

Clinical Negligence & Healthcare

Occupational Disease

Professional Negligence

Serious Injury



Northern Circuit

North Eastern Circuit


University:               University of Manchester

Degree:                    BA (First Class Honours) English Language and Literature

Year of Call:             2006 (Middle Temple)

Awards:                    Middle Temple Benefactors' Scholar


Chambers UK 2022:

"Very experienced junior who is highly thought of, good with clients and has a lot of experience." "A well-prepared opponent who is personable and easy to get along with."

Legal 500 2022:

" Richard is responsive and personable, easy to work with and his written advice is digestible by clients and instructing solictors alike."

"Thoroughness and attention to detail, and intellectual rigour, combined with a practical approach, and ability to get a point across, whether persuasively to a Judge, or to the lay client. Can be relied on to express a careful and considered view, in an understated yet most effective way."

Chambers UK 2021:

"A very versatile barrister, he knows what he's doing and doesn't make mistakes." 

Legal 500 2021:

"Puts clients at ease, explaining the most difficult issues to lay clients in a clear and friendly way. Excellent at getting to the bottom of what a claim is really about and how to win it. Prepares extremely well. Has produced excellent results at Show Cause hearings. Extremely capable in the fields of asbestos and Occupational disease generally."

Chambers UK 2020:

"He is calm, intellectual, superbly organised and very user-friendly."

Legal 500 2019:

‘A barrister who is a safe pair of hands.’

Legal 500 2018:

‘Undaunted by any task.’

Legal 500 2017:

‘He commands respect by virtue of his knowledge, diligent preparation and always being prepared to listen.’

Legal 500 2015:

“He has a practice beyond his call”

© Copyright 2022 Kings Chambers. All rights reserved.

Scroll to Top